The limit of law: factors influencing the decision to make harmful acts illegal
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2021
Journal Title
Economics of Governance
ISSN
1435-6104
DOI
10.1007/s10101-021-00255-w
Abstract
This paper examines factors affecting the decision of whether or not to make certain harmful acts illegal. It considers factors related both to the cost of law enforcement and to the crime commission decision. On the enforcement side, illegality is limited by the existence of fixed notice and response costs, which are unrelated to the harm from the act, and also by costs of imposing punishment. In addition, illegality is limited by a finite marginal productivity of detection, one cause of which is legal error. On the commission side, illegality is limited if offenders have strictly positive benefits from committing the act. The paper concludes by examining how the optimal scope of law is affected by its “expressive function”, the idea that some people are deterred by the mere fact that an act is illegal. We specifically ask how the scope of law changes if more people behave in this way. The answer depends on whether “efficient” violations of the law are possible, which in turn depends on whether offenders’ gains are counted in welfare.
First Page
293
Last Page
307
Num Pages
15
Volume Number
22
Publisher
Springer
Recommended Citation
Thomas J. Miceli & Murat C. Mungan,
The limit of law: factors influencing the decision to make harmful acts illegal,
22
Econ. Governance
293
(2021).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1843