Institutionalized Conflict Resolution: Have We Come to Expect Too Little?
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-2002
Journal Title
Negotiation Journal
ISSN
1571-9979
DOI
10.1111/j.1571-9979.2002.tb00267.x
Abstract
Two very different contexts of the conflict resolution field — hostage negotiation and court-connected mediation — do share many similarities, particularly with regard to roles, responsibilities, and techniques. In both contexts, the emphasis is on the short-term “fix”, or solution, rather than attention to the underlying reasons for a conflict and long-term societal change. This emphasis, though perhaps changing in the international relations area, permeates much of the institutionalized conflict resolution field and bears further examination by practitioners and researchers.
First Page
345
Last Page
350
Num Pages
6
Volume Number
18
Issue Number
4
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Recommended Citation
Nancy A. Welsh & Peter T. Coleman,
Institutionalized Conflict Resolution: Have We Come to Expect Too Little?,
18
Negot. J.
345
(2002).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/963