Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2013
Journal Title
New York University Journal of International Law and Politics
ISSN
0028-7873
Abstract
U.S. asylum law is based on a domestic statute that incorporates an international treaty, the U.N. Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees. While Supreme Court cases indicate that the rules of treaty interpretation apply to an incorporative statute, courts analyzing the statutory asylum pro- visions fail to give weight to the interpretations of our sister signatories, which is one of the distinctive and uncontroversial principles of treaty interpretation. This Article highlights this significant omission and urges courts to examine the interpretations of other States Parties to the Protocol in asylum cases. Using as an example the current debate over social visibility in defining a "particular social group," which is a part of the definition of a "refugee," the Article demonstrates the utility of a comparative analysis even when our sister signatories' interpretations are not uniform. The Article also addresses some of the challenges involved in examining foreign authority, including: how to select and weigh such authority in the context of treaty interpretation; what weight, if any, courts should give to the interpretation of the European Union; and how courts should treat the interpretations of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. The Article concludes that asylum and refugee law is an area ripe for deeper transnational dialogue, in which U.S. courts should play a critical part.
First Page
391
Last Page
486
Num Pages
96
Volume Number
45
Issue Number
2
Publisher
New York University School of Law
Recommended Citation
Fatma E. Marouf,
The Role of Foreign Authorities in U.S. Asylum Adjudication,
45
N.Y.U. J. Int'l L. & Pol.
391
(2013).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/745
File Type
Included in
Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, International Humanitarian Law Commons, International Law Commons