Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2008
Journal Title
Case Western Reserve Law Review
ISSN
0008-7262
Abstract
Is the common law a viable means of addressing environmental problems? The first wave of environmental common law scholarship, together with the law and economics and classical liberal literatures, at least put the issue on the table for discussion. The response from the critics raised some important criticisms, ones that needed to be answered. Whatever the failings of the environmental regulatory state, the common law has failings of its own, including the failure to protect many ecological resources in the period before the enactment of federal environmental law. In some instances administrative regulation may have hampered or "sabotaged" common law protections, but in others the common law failed on its own.
With the generous support of the Roe Foundation for the Property and Environment Research Center, we sought to expand the literature beyond the first round of discussion and to prompt a serious look at the common law's potential, and potential weaknesses, in addressing environmental problems. We wanted to know where the case for the common law stood. The result is the set of articles and comments by the impressive group of authors included in this symposium.
First Page
575
Volume Number
58
Publisher
Case Western Reserve University School of Law
Recommended Citation
Jonathan H. Adler & Andrew P. Morriss,
Introduction, Sypmosium Common Law Environmental Protection,
58
Case W. Res. L. Rev.
575
(2008).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/62