Struck by Stereotype: Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Pregnancy Discrimination as Sex Discrimination
Document Type
Book Section
Publication Date
2-2015
ISBN
9781107477131
DOI
10.1017/CBO9781107477131.006
Abstract
This chapter invites consideration of Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s 1972 merits brief in Struck v. Secretary of Defense. The brief is little known because the Supreme Court of the United States eventually declined to decide the case. But anyone seeking to understand the origins and nature of Justice Ginsburg’s views on sex discrimination would be well advised to read this brief. So would anyone interested in deepening an appreciation of how the Constitution speaks to gender equality.
In her capacity as general counsel for the Women’s Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union, Ginsburg filed the Struck brief a little more than a year after the Court decided Reed v. Reed but before the Court began to shape liberty and equality doctrine concerning the regulation of pregnant women in cases such as Roe v. Wade, Frontiero v. Richardson, and Geduldig v. Aiello. Ginsburg wrote the brief on behalf of an Air Force officer, Captain Susan Struck, whose pregnancy – and whose refusal on religious grounds to have an abortion – subjected her to automatic discharge from military service.
First Page
44
Last Page
56
Num Pages
13
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Editor
Scott Dodson
Book Title
The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Recommended Citation
Neil S. Siegel & Reva B. Siegel,
Struck by Stereotype: Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Pregnancy Discrimination as Sex Discrimination,
in
The Legacy of Ruth Bader Ginsburg
44
(Scott Dodson eds., 2015).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/2244