Competition in the Global Law Market: Offshore Development of the Statutory "Rule in Hastings-Bass"

Authors

Andrew P. Morriss, Texas A&M University School of LawFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

6-2025

Journal Title

Minnesota Journal of International Law

ISSN

1944-0294

Abstract

This Article examines the competitive dynamics in the global law market through the lens of the statutory evolution of the Rule in Hastings-Bass across various International Financial Centers (IFCs). Following the UK Supreme Court's 2013 decision in Pitt v Holt and Futter v Futter, which significantly restricted the judiciary's ability to void trustee decisions under the Rule, seven IFCs (Jersey, Bermuda, The Bahamas, the Dubai International Financial Center, the Cayman Islands, and the British Virgin Islands) enacted statutes to preserve and clarify the Rule within their jurisdictions. These legislative actions highlight the strategic adaptations by IFCs to enhance their legal frameworks and maintain a competitive edge in providing sophisticated trust services. By codifying the Rule, these jurisdictions have addressed key criticisms of the common law version, ensuring greater certainty, flexibility, and protection for trust beneficiaries. The Article argues that this evolution exemplifies the positive role of jurisdictional competition in improving legal services and facilitating international financial transactions, thereby contributing to the global economy.

First Page

121

Last Page

193

Num Pages

73

Volume Number

34

Issue Number

2

Publisher

University of Minnesota Law School

Recommended Citation

Andrew P. Morriss, Competition in the Global Law Market: Offshore Development of the Statutory "Rule in Hastings-Bass", 34 Minn. J. Int'l L. 121 (2025).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/2228

File Type

PDF