Perceptions of Justice: Assessing the Perceived Effectiveness of Punishments by Artificial Intelligence versus Human Judges
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-2025
Journal Title
Review of Law & Economics
ISSN
1555-5879
DOI
10.1515/rle-2024-0049
Abstract
Using an original experimental survey, we analyze how people perceive punishments generated by artificial intelligence (AI) compared to the same punishments generated by a human judge. We use two vignettes pertaining to two different albeit relatively common illegal behaviors, namely not picking up one’s dog waste on public roads and setting fire in dry areas. In general, participants perceived AI judgements as having a larger deterrence effect compared to the those rendered by a judge. However, when we analyzed each scenario separately, we found that the differential effect of AI is only significant in the first scenario. We discuss the implications of these findings.
First Page
1
Last Page
21
Num Pages
21
Publisher
De Gruyter
Recommended Citation
Gilles Grolleau, Murat C. Mungan & Naoufel Mzoughi,
Perceptions of Justice: Assessing the Perceived Effectiveness of Punishments by Artificial Intelligence versus Human Judges,
Rev. L. & Econ.
1
(2025).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/2212