Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-2023
Journal Title
Law & Contemporary Problems
ISSN
0023-9186
Abstract
Private technology increasingly underpins public governance. But the state’s growing reliance on private firms to provide a variety of complex technological products and services for public purposes brings significant costs for transparency: new forms of governance are becoming less visible and less amenable to democratic control. Transparency obligations initially designed for public agencies are a poor fit for private vendors that adhere to a very different set of expectations.
Aligning the use of technology in public governance with democratic values calls for rethinking, and in some cases abandoning, the legal structures and doctrinal commitments that insulate private vendors from meaningful transparency and accountability requirements. This Article offers three suggestions to achieve this realignment: reducing protections for trade secrecy, enhancing whistleblower protections, and developing a “public option” to compete with private domination.
First Page
223
Last Page
255
Num Pages
33
Volume Number
86
Issue Number
3
Publisher
Duke University School of Law
Recommended Citation
Hannah Bloch-Wehba,
A Public Technology Option,
86
Law & Contemp. Probs.
223
(2023).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1972
File Type
Included in
Internet Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons