Economics of the Independent Invention Defense under Incomplete Information
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2012
Journal Title
Supreme Court Economic Review
ISSN
0736-9921
DOI
10.1086/668519
Abstract
Patents lead to ex post deadweight loss arising from a noncompetitive market structure for the invention. Many have argued that introducing independent invention as a defense (IID) to patent infringement can increase social welfare by decreasing such deadweight loss at the price of a modest decrease in the number of inventions. This paper considers the effects of IID in a setting where R&D firms have incomplete information about their rivals. Four main results follow under incomplete information: (i) fewer things are invented under an IID regime; (ii) IID's effects on welfare are ambiguous; (iii) IID is more likely to increase welfare if gains from competition in the product market are high; and (iv) determining precise conditions under which IID performs better than the current regime requires access to data that are extremely hard to find and quantify.
First Page
183
Last Page
203
Num Pages
21
Volume Number
20
Publisher
University of Chicago Press
Recommended Citation
Murat C. Mungan,
Economics of the Independent Invention Defense under Incomplete Information,
20
Sup. Ct. Econ. Rev.
183
(2012).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1874