The effect of evidentiary rules on conviction rates
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-2022
Journal Title
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization
ISSN
0167-2681
DOI
10.1016/j.jebo.2022.09.026
Abstract
Evidentiary rules for criminal trials disallow various forms of probative evidence. Conventional wisdom assumes these rules benefit all defendants, whether guilty or innocent, and thus reduce wrongful convictions at the price of more wrongful acquittals. We show the conventional view only holds under stylized conditions. We further identify properties of evidence generation mechanisms under which the conventional view is backward: an evidentiary rule will harm the innocent and protect the guilty. However, if adjudicators place too much weight on the evidence, its exclusion can reduce both wrongful convictions and wrongful acquittals.
First Page
563
Last Page
576
Num Pages
14
Volume Number
203
Publisher
Elsevier
Recommended Citation
Alex Lundberg & Murat C. Mungan,
The effect of evidentiary rules on conviction rates,
203
J. Econ. Behav. & Org.
563
(2022).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1824