Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
6-2021
Abstract
A consensus seems to be emerging that algorithmic governance is too opaque and ought to be made more accountable and transparent. But algorithmic governance underscores the limited capacity of transparency law—the Freedom of Information Act and its state equivalents—to promote accountability. Drawing on the critical literature on “open government,” this Essay shows that algorithmic governance reflects and amplifies systemic weaknesses in the transparency regime, including privatization, secrecy, private sector cooptation, and reactive disclosure. These deficiencies highlight the urgent need to reorient transparency and accountability law toward meaningful public engagement in ongoing oversight. This shift requires rethinking FOIA’s core commitment to public disclosure of agency records, exploring instead alternative ways to empower the public and to shed light on decisionmaking. The Essay argues that new approaches to transparency and accountability for algorithmic governance should be independent of private vendors, and ought to adequately represent the interests of affected individuals and communities. These considerations, of vital importance for the oversight of automated systems, also hold broader lessons for efforts to recraft open government obligations in the public interest.
Num Pages
34
Series Title
Data & Democracy Essay Series
Publisher
Knight First Amendment Institute
Recommended Citation
Hannah Bloch-Wehba,
Transparency's AI Problem,
(2021).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1477
File Type
Included in
Computer Law Commons, Criminal Law Commons, Criminal Procedure Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Law and Society Commons, Science and Technology Law Commons