Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-2020
Journal Title
HYLE – International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry
ISSN
1433-5158
Abstract
Throughout the biotechnology age, fears about the distortionary effects of property and other legal institutions upon the health and self-determination of individuals and societies have accompanied more popularly sensational fears about unscrupulous choices within the scientific community itself. Still, for most of that time the prevailing legal regime both in the United States and in Europe remained generally permissive of ownership of, and exclusionary power over, the fruits of much biomedical research, though this leniency took different forms and came about in different ways. In particular, the policy of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to grant patents on genetic compositions such as DNA sequences produced an extensive landscape of legal rights that would eventually provoke a backlash in both legal and popular opinion during the Myriad Genetics lawsuit. This case study examines the normative dimension of patent rights over isolated DNA sequences through the lens of the Myriad case, discussing the institutional context in which the case arose and identifying ethical lessons that the case offers.
First Page
55
Last Page
78
Num Pages
24
Volume Number
26
Issue Number
1
Publisher
Hyle Publications
Recommended Citation
Saurabh Vishnubhakat,
The Normative Molecule: Patent Rights and DNA,
26
HYLE
55
(2020).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1436
File Type
Included in
Intellectual Property Law Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons