Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-2015

Journal Title

Brooklyn Journal of International Law

ISSN

0740-4824

Abstract

In the last several years, a consensus has developed that a wide gulf exists between European and American privacy law, although division still exists on whether European law is “more protective” or simply “home to different intuitive sensibilities” than American law. Existing research on the development of European privacy law has focused on two areas: nineteenth-century traditions of honor and dueling, which gave rise to a concept of privacy linked to dignity, and the totalitarian dictatorships of the twentieth century, in reaction to which privacy protected liberty. This Article offers a contrasting view by showing that European privacy law in the post-World War II era was intended to defend a particular aspect of the “private sphere” — marriage, reproduction, and the family — from the type of omnipresent scrutiny that had been a core aspect of the racial state under the Nazi regime. Although both European and American concepts of privacy have undoubtedly changed over time, understanding the original intent embedded in European privacy law shows that divergence between the two systems has been largely misunderstood.

First Page

749

Last Page

790

Num Pages

42

Volume Number

40

Issue Number

3

Publisher

Brooklyn Law School

File Type

PDF

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.