Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-2019
Journal Title
Washington and Lee Law Review
ISSN
0043-0463
Abstract
The Trump Administration’s new immigration policy of family separation at the U.S./Mexico border rocked the summer of 2018. Yet family separation is the prerequisite to every legal adoption. The circumstances are different, of course. In legal adoption, the biological parents are provided with all the constitutional protections required in involuntary termination of parental rights, or they have voluntarily consented to family separation. But what happens when that family separation is wrongful, when the birth mother’s consent is not voluntary, or when the birth father’s wishes to parent are ignored? In theory, the child can be returned to the birth parents when consent is invalid because of fraud, coercion, or deceit. In actuality, courts are very reluctant to undo an adoption. How, then, to deter adoption agencies and workers from wrongfully separating birth parents and their children?
Adoption agencies are not just social welfare institutions, but also businesses motivated by money. Lawsuits, as a cost of doing business, can affect their bottom line. The adoption industry has been responsive in the past to lawsuits from adoptive parents seeking money damages, which suggests that lawsuits from birth parents that affect the bottom line could incentivize better behavior from adoption agencies. This Article explores possible tort causes of action available to birth parents, including a proposed new tort of wrongful family separation, with the long-term objective of changing adoption agency behavior, potentially transforming adoption practice.
First Page
895
Last Page
962
Num Pages
68
Volume Number
76
Issue Number
2
Publisher
Washington and Lee University School of Law
Recommended Citation
Malinda L. Seymore,
Adopting Civil Damages: Wrongful Family Separation in Adoption,
76
Wash. & Lee L.R.
895
(2019).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1309