Document Type

Book Section

Publication Date

3-2014

ISBN

978-1-4438-5501-3

Abstract

This chapter explores feminist jurisprudence regarding women who commit acts of violence, focusing specifically on questions of agency in neonaticide (killing a newborn). A case study approach illustrates the debate in feminist theory between same-treatment and different-treatment of women as compared to men. While some feminist criminologists urge that women who kill must be viewed the same as men (as having agency and responsibility), other feminists question this approach and point out that women who commit crimes that intersect with family law receive disproportionately harsh treatment and should be treated differently than men.

This chapter contends that the paradox raised by the sameness versus difference approach may be side-stepped by analyzing the issue through Martha Fineman’s rhetoric of the vulnerable subject. Sharing parallels with kairos of the Sophists, Fineman’s rhetoric of vulnerability provides a pragmatic lens through which to examine laws concerning neonaticide and to argue for changes to these laws as well as for changes in the availability of state resources to provide women who have committed neonaticide with resilience.

First Page

83

Last Page

97

Num Pages

15

Publisher

Cambridge Scholars Publishing

Place

Newcastle, UK

Rights

Copyright © 2014. Cambridge Scholars Publisher & the authors. All rights reserved.

Editor

Kirsti Cole

Book Title

Feminist Challenges or Feminist Rhetorics? Locations, Scholarship, Discourse

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.