"Erasing Illusions" by Kirsten Worden
  •  
  •  
 

Authors

Kirsten Worden

Document Type

Comment

Abstract

Since the passage of the California Consumer Privacy Act in 2018, states have rushed to pass their own consumer data protection laws, filling the glaring absence of comprehensive federal privacy law in the United States. These state privacy statutes are largely modeled after the European Union’s (“EU’s”) General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which introduced the “right to be forgotten.” This right permits EU residents to request that organizations delete their personal information. U.S. state laws have followed the GDPR by adopting a “right to delete.” Yet these new state laws provide little detail about the right to delete and lack mechanisms to ensure enforcement, meaning the U.S. right to delete offers a hollow promise of consumer control. Moreover, the current U.S. privacy regime—including state common law, enforcement by state attorneys general, sector-specific federal laws, and actions by the Federal Trade Commission—fails to compensate for the bare-bones approach to deletion rights employed at the state level. Privacy statutes should include a combination of individual deletion rights and “structural” business requirements to fully protect deletion interests and create meaningful consumer control. Statutes should include broadly drafted deletion provisions, verification requirements, a private right of action, data destruction requirements, data mapping requirements, third-party deletion obligations, and agency reporting mechanisms.

DOI

10.37419/LR.V12.I2.10

First Page

925

Last Page

960

Included in

Privacy Law Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.