It’s in the “Telling” (by Asking): A Passover Analogy to Explain the Enduring Foundational Nature of Carrie Menkel-Meadow’s Dispute Resolution Scholarship

Authors

James R. Coben, Mitchell Hamline School of LawFollow

Document Type

Article

Abstract

One true measure of whether ideas are “foundational” is whether they will resonate with future generations. Judaism, one of the world’s oldest religions, offers an annual ritual—the Passover Seder—that exemplifies success in passing down foundational ideas. That ritual, among other things, posits that to tell an enduring story, it must be told in ways that inspire many different kinds of people—with widely disparate motivations, perspectives, and abilities—to engage with, relate to, and understand the story. This Essay asserts that Carrie Menkel-Meadow’s dispute resolution scholarship is very much a successful “telling” with many characteristics remarkably similar to the Passover Seder. And that in turn explains why Menkel-Meadow’s work has been so important to the first generation of dispute resolution scholars and practitioners, and why it will endure as foundational for generations to come.

DOI

10.37419/LR.V10.I1.2

First Page

25

Last Page

42

Recommended Citation

James R. Coben, It’s in the “Telling” (by Asking): A Passover Analogy to Explain the Enduring Foundational Nature of Carrie Menkel-Meadow’s Dispute Resolution Scholarship, 10 Tex. A&M L. Rev. 25 (2022).
Available at: https://doi.org/10.37419/LR.V10.I1.2