Temporary Takings, More or Less

Authors

Timothy M. Mulvaney, Texas A&M University School of LawFollow

Document Type

Book Section

Publication Date

1-2015

ISBN

978-0-19-936874-7

DOI

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199368747.003.0022

Abstract

In accord with the Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in First English, when a property owner successfully challenges a regulation as a taking and the government chooses to repeal that offending regulation, the government must pay compensation for losses sustained during the period for which that regulation was in effect, regardless of whether the regulation originally was enacted in good faith. This book chapter introduces a conception of ownership grounded in humility that recognizes the limited reach of human knowledge and the variability of our normative positions. It suggests that a conception of ownership grounded in humility calls for a more contextual analysis in temporary takings cases than First English and its recent progeny, Arkansas Game and Koontz, allow, and raises for discussion the possibility that such an analysis might appropriately turn in part on whether the governmental entity acted in good faith when attempting to update property rules via regulation.

First Page

461

Last Page

477

Num Pages

17

Publisher

Oxford University Press

Place

New York, NY

Editor

Randall S. Abate

Book Title

Climate Change Impacts on Ocean and Coastal Law: U.S. and International Perspectives

Recommended Citation

Timothy M. Mulvaney, Temporary Takings, More or Less, in Climate Change Impacts on Ocean and Coastal Law: U.S. and International Perspectives 461 (Randall S. Abate eds., 2015).
Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/1081