Texas Wesleyan Law Review
Publication Date
10-1-1998
Document Type
Article
Abstract
This paper examines the substantial need for a defense to criminal culpability that has a lesser requirement than the traditional defenses of insanity and intoxication. The article details the traditional defenses of insanity, involuntary intoxication, and voluntary intoxication. Additionally, the myths surrounding diminished capacity are explored. In conclusion, an examination is made of the essence of mitigation in a capital murder context and the need to recognize a defense of diminished capacity to the death penalty.
DOI
10.37419/TWLR.V5.I1.1
First Page
1
Last Page
33
Recommended Citation
Katherine A. Drew,
Diminished Capacity as a Result of Intoxication and Addiction: The Capacity to Mitigate Punishment and the Need for Recognition in Texas Death Penalty Litigation,
5
Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev.
1
(1998).
Available at:
https://doi.org/10.37419/TWLR.V5.I1.1