This Article analyzes the highly publicized case of Snyder v. Phelps to illustrate the current status of the tort of Outrage and asks whether courts should continue to recognize this tort or whether, in the name of refinement, the courts have eviscerated the protections and necessity of the tort.
Constance A. Anastopoulo & Daniel J. Crooks III,
Where's the Outrage? "Outrageous" Conduct in Analyzing the Tort of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress in the Wake of Snyder v. Phelps,
Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev.
Available at: https://doi.org/10.37419/TWLR.V19.I3.1