•  
  •  
 

Texas Wesleyan Law Review

Authors

Thomas A. Daily

Publication Date

3-1-2012

Document Type

Article

Abstract

Unlike some other jurisdictions, Arkansas does not typically have large annual volumes of oil and gas related cases or legislation. The most recent year was pretty normal in that respect. This Article will review several changes in Arkansas oil and gas law: (a) one legislative change, itself inspired by a Justice's dissenting opinion in a case interpreting the previous statute; (b) three fairly unremarkable opinions of the Arkansas Court of Appeals; (c) and two noteworthy federal district court opinions-the first determined the ownership of coal-bed methane gas between competing gas and coal owners, and the second, rather interesting ruling, involved a group of landmen's possible unauthorized practice of law.

DOI

10.37419/TWLR.V18.I3.4

First Page

467

Last Page

471

Share

COinS