Texas Wesleyan Law Review
Publication Date
3-1-2012
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Unlike some other jurisdictions, Arkansas does not typically have large annual volumes of oil and gas related cases or legislation. The most recent year was pretty normal in that respect. This Article will review several changes in Arkansas oil and gas law: (a) one legislative change, itself inspired by a Justice's dissenting opinion in a case interpreting the previous statute; (b) three fairly unremarkable opinions of the Arkansas Court of Appeals; (c) and two noteworthy federal district court opinions-the first determined the ownership of coal-bed methane gas between competing gas and coal owners, and the second, rather interesting ruling, involved a group of landmen's possible unauthorized practice of law.
DOI
10.37419/TWLR.V18.I3.4
First Page
467
Last Page
471
Recommended Citation
Thomas A. Daily,
Arkansas,
18
Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev.
467
(2012).
Available at:
https://doi.org/10.37419/TWLR.V18.I3.4