Texas Wesleyan Law Review
Publication Date
10-1-2007
Document Type
Comment
Abstract
This Comment will analyze the persisting area of divide that is responsible for delaying the Texas Legislature's implementation of Atkins. First, it will look at how the differing procedural approaches represent the larger political issues in the pro- and anti-death penalty debate surrounding the Texas Legislature's original pre-Atkins attempts to implement a ban on the execution of mentally retarded offenders. Additionally, it will provide a high-level overview of bills introduced since Atkins was decided, focusing on the most contentious issues that persisted from those attempts. It will also review how the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has answered some of these issues in the interim. Finally, it will analyze how these various approaches compare to other states that have successfully conquered this issue and will look at how the Supreme Court is likely to determine growing state procedural challenges.
DOI
10.37419/TWLR.V14.I1.6
First Page
145
Last Page
166
Recommended Citation
Sarah G. Tuthill,
The Texas-Size Struggle to Implement Atkins v. Virginia,
14
Tex. Wesleyan L. Rev.
145
(2007).
Available at:
https://doi.org/10.37419/TWLR.V14.I1.6