Document Type

Arguendo (Online)

Abstract

In the important November 2024 case of Amazon.com Services LLC, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”) held employer “captive audience speeches” to be per se unlawful. The NLRB held that employer anti-union speeches of this kind, delivered on paid company time on company premises and which employees are required to attend, unlawfully intruded on employee privacy and autonomy. This Article critiques the NLRB’s recent Amazon.com decision from various perspectives. First, the NLRB, in its ruling, appears to ignore decades-long precedent in this area of the law, precedent that firmly upheld the “free speech” rights of employers to give speeches of this kind, so long as such speeches are not explicitly threatening or coercive in nature. Second, the NLRB ignored the clear tradeoff made in earlier precedents which allow employers to make at-work speeches of this kind so long as labor unions are permitted the offsetting right to campaign by visiting employees at their homes while employers are prohibited from this activity, i.e., the “Home Visits Doctrine.” This Article argues that any alteration of employer captive audience speech rights necessitates the concomitant revisitation of the Home Visits Doctrine, which it argues is outdated and also involves significant infringements on employee privacy and autonomy rights. The Article then concludes with various recommendations for reform, some drawn from the proposed Protecting the Right to Organize Act of 2021 passed by the then-Democratic majority in the U.S. House of Representatives in March of 2021.

DOI

10.37419/LR.V13.Arg.3

First Page

Last Page

Recommended Citation

Leonard Bierman & Rafael Gely, Amazon.com and the NLRB: Privacy Rights, Home Visits and Beyond, 13 Tex. A&M L. Rev. Arguendo 27 (2025).
Available at: https://doi.org/10.37419/LR.V13.Arg.3