Document Type

Article

Publication Year

2008

Journal Title

Supreme Court Economic Review

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that social decision-making is subject to a fundamental conflict between consistency and completeness. We show that a consistent welfarist method of policy assessment, that is, one that never violates the Pareto principle, may be incomplete in the sense of being incapable of providing a solution to important social welfare problems.

First Page

117

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS