Document Type

Article

Publication Date

3-2026

Journal Title

North Carolina Law Review

ISSN

0029-2524

Abstract

This Article provides the first comprehensive analysis of the intersection between decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and American bankruptcy law. DAOs are blockchain-based entities that enable individuals to pursue common goals using decentralized decision-making and automated governance. Since their recent emergence, DAOs have proliferated dramatically—with over 20,000 organizations managing over $20 billion in assets and engaging in activities ranging from investment management to real estate and even attempting to purchase historic copies of the U.S. Constitution. Yet like any other organization, DAOs can fail, creating an urgent need to understand what happens when unstoppable code meets immovable bankruptcy law.

Our investigation unfolds along three interconnected lines of inquiry. First, we observe DAOs through a novel analytical prism, moving beyond conventional technological and organizational taxonomies to uncover their insolvency-relevant attributes. Second, drawing on these findings and the 2024 bankruptcy filing of HectorDAO, we posit that the core ideals of DAOs—decentralization, automation, rejection of intermediaries, and resistance to state law—fundamentally conflict with court-supervised insolvency proceedings, forcing these organizations to either compromise their ethos or forgo voluntary bankruptcy protection. Third, recognizing this tension, we theorize a “decentralized autonomous bankruptcy” framework for DAOs. This thought experiment, which we call BrokeDAO, reveals the potential for blockchain technology to create innovative solutions for debt resolution. Yet, it also exposes the inherent limitations of attempting to replicate the comprehensive protections of bankruptcy purely through private ordering.

Studying the interface between DAOs and bankruptcy law yields substantial contributions to both fields. While the literature on digital assets remains overwhelmingly focused on regulatory questions, our research offers essential private law insights that will prove crucial during inevitable future market downturns. Moreover, viewing bankruptcy law through the lens of DAOs underscores the singularity of bankruptcy’s centralized and compulsory framework and its inescapable relevance in the crypto ecosystem.

First Page

657

Last Page

718

Num Pages

62

Volume Number

104

Issue Number

3

Publisher

UNC School of Law

Notes

© 2026 Kara Bruce, Christopher K. Odinet & Andrea Tosato

File Type

PDF

Download

SSRN

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.