Document Type
Book Section
Publication Date
12-2024
ISBN
9781009391917
DOI
10.1017/9781009391894.006
Abstract
The Supreme Court’s jurisprudence pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) has successfully encouraged the use of arbitration to resolve disputes of all types, including those arising out of contracts of adhesion. Meanwhile, with one very limited exception, neither Congress nor the Supreme Court has done anything to assure those bound by adhesive contracts that the required arbitration process will be fair, impartial, and consistent with due process principles. The FAA does not even include a definition of arbitration to guide arbitration providers and individual arbitrators. This chapter proposes the addition of a definition of arbitration to the FAA to make it clear that: (1) arbitration is a decision-making process involving binding adjudication by a third party; (2) arbitration must meet the requirements of due process, including but not limited to an impartial arbitrator; and (3) arbitration providers must have a mechanism in place to assure sufficient due process and impartiality. In the adhesive contract context, this last requirement would help ensure that judicial enforcement of arbitration clauses and arbitral awards is conditioned on a sufficient showing of the safeguards put into place to protect structural bias – which should then both justify requests for discovery on this issue and incentivize arbitration providers’ establishment of the needed structural and procedural safeguards.
First Page
35
Last Page
47
Num Pages
13
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Rights
Reproduced with permission. Original chapter available at https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009391894.006
Editor
Richard A. Bales & Jill I. Gross
Book Title
The Federal Arbitration Act: Successes, Failures, and a Roadmap for Reform
Recommended Citation
Nancy A. Welsh,
Section 1: Defining Arbitration and Addressing Structural Bias,
in
The Federal Arbitration Act: Successes, Failures, and a Roadmap for Reform
35
(Richard A. Bales & Jill I. Gross eds., 2024).
Available at:
https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/2174
File Type
Included in
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Legislation Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons